LEARNING CENTER
Can Pets Be Claimed as Dependents? A Legal Challenge Against the IRS
Many pet owners have probably faced the daunting annual expense report of vet bills, grooming, and specialty foods and thought, “Surely, this pet is just like a family member.” In an unprecedented legal action, one attorney is bringing this sentiment to the courtroom, challenging conventional tax guidelines in an effort to redefine what—or rather who—can be considered a dependent in the eyes of the IRS.
In December 2025, New York-based attorney Amanda Reynolds initiated a remarkable lawsuit against the IRS, seeking federal acknowledgment of her eight-year-old golden retriever, Finnegan, as a dependent for tax purposes. The unique case raises pivotal questions about tax deductions related to pets, prompting a broader discussion on the intersection of tax law and pet ownership.
Exploring the Case: "My Dog Qualifies as a Dependent"
Reynolds's argument posits that Finnegan satisfies the IRS's stipulations for a dependent due to the following:
He resides with her year-round.
He does not earn any income.
Reynolds provides over half of Finnegan's support, with expenditures surpassing $5,000 annually for food, medical care, and daycare.
Citing a national news report, Reynolds passionately defends her claim by stating, “In all respects, Finnegan is akin to a daughter—a true 'dependent.'” Aside from financial and emotional considerations, Reynolds pushes forward constitutional arguments, citing "Equal Protection" and "improper taking" under the Fifth Amendment as grounds for her case.
Current Status of the Case
The case is being reviewed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and it remains active albeit slowed by a temporary pause in discovery, as a federal magistrate judge has halted the evidence exchange pending the IRS's motion to dismiss. The court's order highlights the "novel yet important debate" about categorizing companion animals as "dependents," but also suggests significant legal challenges. Early indications suggest that the claims are "unlikely to withstand dismissal."
Tax Law's Stance on Pets as Dependents
A fundamental obstacle in this legal battle is the tax law's explicit language. Section 152 of the Internal Revenue Code delineates dependents as "qualifying individuals," historically interpreted as human beings. IRS protocols require Social Security numbers or taxpayer identification numbers for dependents, making no allowances for pets, as they do not align with human-centric tax benefits.
Tackling the argument from a practical perspective, specific deductible scenarios do exist for animals, offering an area of tax planning interest:
1) Service Animals as Medical Deductions
When animals function as trained service animals assisting with disabilities, expenditures such as training and maintenance may qualify as deductible medical expenses, provided they are documented under itemized deductions and surpass the applicable AGI threshold. The IRS guidelines underscore the distinction between service and emotional support animals, the latter not qualifying for similar deductions.
2) Business Animals as Tax Deductions
Certain animals used for business reasons—such as a guard dog or animals in pest control—can have related costs deducted as necessary business expenses. It's essential for taxpayers to substantiate the business role with solid documentation.
3) Charitable Contributions Through Animal Fostering
Fostering pets for authorized organizations might allow for some unreimbursed expenses to be claimed as charitable deductions when supported by strict records and eligibility.
Tax Implications: What Pet Owners Need to Know
Despite the compelling emotional undertone of Reynolds's case—echoing the sentiment that pets are indeed family members—the tax framework remains uncoupled from emotional appeals and adheres strictly to statutory definitions.
Domestic pets cannot be dependents for tax purposes.
Regular pet expenses, such as vet care or grooming, generally remain non-deductible.
In certain cases, animal-related expenses can be deductible through service, business conduct, or charitable fostering scenarios.
As the lawsuit unfolds, it serves more as an illustration of increasing pet reliance in American households, rather than a herald to policy changes recognizing animals as dependents.
Want tax & accounting tips and insights?
Sign up for our newsletter.
I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By
clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the
and
.
Get In Touch With Cherokee CPA
You can count on us for professional, timely, and reliable tax and accounting services. If you’re ready to get started, just fill out this form and we’ll be in touch.
Welcome to Cherokee CPA. How can we help?
Click here for assistance
Welcome to Cherokee CPA. Do you have some questions we can answer?
Please fill out the form and our team will get back to you shortly
The form was sent successfully